Have you heard about the version of Dracula also made in 1931 and also by Universal Pictures? This version was made in Spanish and made to capitalise on the demand for foreign- language films. It was directed by George Melford and even utilised the same sets as Tod Browning’s epic.

Whilst this version was shot and released abroad, it was largely forgotten about. But a print was found and then it was released on home video a few years after. Reviews started to appear, with some critics preferring it to Browning’s version.

But, which is the better film?

Whilst Melford’s film is very well directed with an excellent and with, in some scenes, more emphasis on how extraordinarily detailed the sets were, it just isn’t as good.

There’s also one glaring distinction- Carlos Villarías, whilst doing a great job, just isn’t as great in the role as Bela Lugosi. Villarias also prompts some unintentional laughs in some instances.

An interesting film and far from being a dud, this version of Dracula is worth seeing. But it’s not the iconic film that Browning’s version is. I’m glad it’s in wider circulation these days though.

3 out of 5 stars